Options
There are many way to solve the same configuration. Each one has its pros and cons. It is up to the user to choose the one feels most comfortable with.
These are 4 different ways to solve the same configuration.
|
Click these 3 buttons
|
|
| 1) |
|
|
| 2.1) |
Moves the cubie OWB from rub to rdf (To avoid 'side effect from the next rotation) Moves the cubie in position 'ldf' to the position 'luf'.That is the reason for the sledgehammer at point 1 |
|
| 2.2) | Brings the cubie in 'ruf' to the position 'luf' | |
| 2.3) |
|
|
|
|
||
| 1) |
Brings the cubie OWB from position 'luf' to position 'ruf'Since no cubie on the yellow face has been placed, the OWB cubie can be moved with a simple rotation, instead of using the sledgehammer (as in the 'Solution Demo' example) |
|
| 2.1) |
Moves the cubie in position 'ldf' to the position 'luf'.That is the reason for the sledgehammer at point 1 |
|
| 2.2) | Brings the cubie in 'ruf' to the position 'luf' | |
| 2.3) |
|
|
|
|
||
| 1) |
Puts both the cubies onto the workbench.Just a third way to put the two cubes on the same line. |
|
| 2) | 3 3 times |
Swaps the cubie at 'ruf' and 'luf'.this time the sledgehammer must be repeated 3 times for correct orientation of the OWB cubie. The first iteration brings the cubie into place but the orientation is not correct. The other two iterations correct the orientation |
| 3) |
|
|
|
|
||
| 1) |
Brings the destination cubie from position 'ldf' to position 'rdf'
This time the diagonal swap is used instead of the in-line swap.
No particular reason for this choice. It is just one of the options available. |
|
| 2) | 3 3 times |
Swaps DIAGONALLY the cubie at 'rdf' and 'luf'.this time the sledgehammer must be repeated 3 times for correct orientation of the OWB cubie. The first iteration brings the cubie into place but the orientation is not correct. The other two iterations correct the orientation. |
| 3) |
|
|
|
|
||